Thursday, 9 February 2012

Bibliography

"HISTORY OF THE INDUS CIVILIZATION." HistoryWorld - History and Timelines. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?historyid=ab73>.
"Internet History Sourcebooks." FORDHAM.EDU. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/hamcode.asp>.
"Babylonia, A History of Ancient Babylon." World History International: World History Essays From Prehistory To The Present. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://history-world.org/babylonia.htm>.
"The Harappan Civilization by Tarini J. Carr." Archaeology Online: Aryan Invasion, India Indology. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/harappa-mohenjodaro.html>. 
"Ancient Babylonia - Social Hierarchy." Bible History Online Images and Resources for Biblical History. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.bible-history.com/babylonia/BabyloniaSocial_Hierarchy.htm>.
Sinha, Ankur. "History, India, Indus Valley Civilization." Indian History, The Great History of India. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.indohistory.com/indus_valley_civilization.html>. 
"ECONOMICS OF THE INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION." Home - CSU, Chico. Web. 03 Feb. 2012. <http://www.csuchico.edu/~cheinz/syllabi/asst001/fall97/2chd.htm>.
 Van, De Mieroop, Marc. A History of the Ancient Near East Ca. 3000-323 BC. Malden, Mass. [u.a.: Blackwell, 2007. Print.
Harris, Nathaniel. The History of Ancient Egypt. London England: Chancellor, 2000. Print.
Kemp, Barry J. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.
Introduction. Web. 4 Feb. 2012. <http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/>.





The Similarities and differences


The Indus River Valley Civilization had almost nothing in common with the Egyptians and the Babylonians; where Babylonia and Egypt had clearly defined and stratified social classes Harappa did not, where there was slavery in Babylonia and Egypt there was probably none in the Indus River Valley. This might prompt some to believe that the Indus River Valley Civilization is alien to most of the ancient world there are still a few similarities. For instance the vast majority of citizens were engaged in agricultural jobs and men were the dominant sex in Babylon and Egypt however women had certain rights, (for instance in Babylonia a women could decide to divorce without her husbands permission) however in the Indus River Valley Civilization women had almost no rights.

Ancient Egypt on the other hand is a textbook example of the average social class system of the ancient world. It was ruled over by a divine monarch who wielded absolute power. One rung down and one will find the pharaoh’s inner circle of advisors and the vizier who was a chamberlain and a High Priest (demonstrating another common characteristic of ancient civilizations; the combination of government and religion). Followed by the Pharaoh’s inner circle was the nobility followed by scribes who not only kept records but played an administrative role in ancient Egypt, followed by the farmers and finally the slaves. Without much tweaking this social pyramid could be applied to almost any ancient civilization.

There were also however some unique aspects to the society of the ancient Egyptians. Women who although did not have equal rights to their male counterparts were nonetheless slightly less second class citizens than in Babylonia and the Indus River Valley. Queens could rule in the own right and were not merely the woman married to the pharaoh.

Babylon continues this trend of stratified social classes with the divine unquestionable king at the top and the slave at the bottom who was little more than chattel and could be abused or otherwise at their master’s whim. Babylon and Egypt have very little difference in social classes.

The royalty of Babylonia


Royalty
As with most, if not all, ancient civilizations there was a patriarchal monarchy who wielded absolute power. The leader of Babylonia was not only a mere king however, he also ruled by divine right and was a living God. Although deification of humans, let alone whilst they are still alive, seems strange by modern standards it was common practice in ancient times.

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

The three main social classes of Babylon

The Awilu
As mentioned in social levels and writing of Babylon the awilu are the highest of the three main social classes of ancient Babylonia. According to Fordham University their bodies were defined as more valuable in Hammurabi's Code and wealthier than the other two main social classes  (Social Levels and Writing - Babylon).

The Muskenu
The Muskenu, or freedman, were former slaves that had been freed. Despite being freed they did not have equal rights to the awailu. This can be most easily described with the use of Hammurabi's Code as in the Code of Laws the bodies of the Muskenu were not seen as important as the bodies of the awilu and therefore, some would say ironically, had to pay less for medication (World History International).

The Wardu
As stated in World history International the Wardu, at the very bottom of the social pyramid are the slave class. The vast majority of this class were prisoners of war however some did come from the native Babylonians, for instance if a man was in debt then he could sell off his wife and children to slavery to pay it off.



("Babylonia, A History of Ancient Babylon Part Seven." World History International: World History Essays From Prehistory To The Present. Web. 05 Feb. 2012. <http://history-world.org/bab2.htm>.)
"Social Levels & Writing - Babylon   ." Babylon    - Babylon. Web. 05 Feb. 2012. <http://babylonians272.weebly.com/social-levels--writing.html>.

Monday, 6 February 2012

Social classes of the Indus River Valley Civilization



The Indus River Valley Civilization existed from ca. 3300 to 1300 BC in modern day Pakistan and North West India south of the Himalayan Mountains, east of the Pakistan Highlands, west of the Thar Desert and, somewhat predictably, around the Indus River. The Indus River Valley Civilization is also known as Harappan civilization and one of its most significant elements concerning social classes is that there were little if none at all. For this reason among many, including a lack of complex religion, some historians do not refer to Harappan society as a civilization.

Because of this lack of social classes the City-States or country of the Indus River Valley Civilization (it is unknown whether it was unified or separate) is referred to as a Chiefdom as opposed to a kingdom or an empire.

Furthermore the egalitarian nature of the Indus River Valley Civilization is additional evidence to the absence of social classes; some historians even suggest that it is possible that all the grain was divided up equally to all citizens however this theory cannot be called a fact because the granaries that the grain was supposedly stored in might not have been granaries despite no other idea for their possible usage.

Additionally the houses of the Indus River Valley Civilization were approximately equal in size hinting that the occupants were equal in wealth as no one could afford larger houses or not be able to afford the average house.

Despite these almost facts the Indus River Valley Civilization did have a difference in social status when it came to gender and age; women had practically no rights and were not legalised to do anything without the direct permission of their husband, moreover males could do as they pleased with their wife and children without having to answer to any laws.

Although it is widely accepted that, when it came to social classes, there were none but there is a small amount of evidence to suggest that there may have been three main social groups albeit without a vast difference in wealth or prestige between them. The first group or the ruling class lived in the city centre and was made up of wealthy merchants and the high priests. They second group consisted of small time merchants, artisans and craftsmen. The labourers belonged to the third group, were quite poor and lived in small huts.

"Indus Civilization Introduction." The Ancient Indus Valley and the British Raj in India and Pakistan. Web. 05 Feb. 2012. <http://www.harappa.com/har/indus-saraswati.html>

Maps of Ancient Egypt, Harappa and Babylonia at their greatest extent


"Indus Valley Civilization." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilization>. 


"Ancient Egypt Map | Maps Of Ancient Egypt." Ancient Egypt - Gods, Pyramids, Mummies, Pharaohs, Queens, Hieroglyphics, History, Life in Ancient Egypt, Maps. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/ancient-egypt-map.html>.

Sunday, 5 February 2012

Social classes in Ancient Egyptian society


In ancient Egyptian society people lived in a system where by the Pharaoh was at the top (with all the power) and farmers and slaves at the bottom. The groups of people nearest the top of society were the richest and most powerful. And the people at the bottom usually worked for the rich and powerful and had poor lifestyles.

The pharaoh in Ancient Egypt

The Pharaoh was believed to be a God on earth and had the most power. He was responsible for making laws and keeping order, ensuring that Egypt was not attacked or invaded by enemies and for keeping the Gods happy so that the Nile flooded and there was a good harvest.
Harris, Nathaniel. The History of Ancient Egypt. London England: Chancellor, 2000. Print.

The Vizier in Ancient Egypt

The Vizier was the Pharaoh's chief advisor and was sometimes also the High Priest. He was responsible for overseeing administration and all official documents had to have his seal of approval. He was also responsible for the supply of food, settling disputes between nobles and the running and protection of the Pharaoh's household.
 Harris, Nathaniel. The History of Ancient Egypt. London England: Chancellor, 2000. Print.

The Nobles in Ancient Egypt

Nobles in Egyptian society were related to the pharaoh, priests, scribes, doctors, lawyers, or important military personnel. Many of the nobles were overseers of the lands worked by peasants. Taxes from these lands were paid to the government in the form of crops or cattle. These crops in turn were used to pay skilled workers and peasants for their labour to build public works.
Kemp, Barry J. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Scribes in Ancient Egypt

Scribes played an important role in early Egypt. Only scribes and priests were taught how to read and write. They had to memorize hieroglyphic symbols. Scribes not only kept records, they also often played a supervisory role in society. The position of scribe was often inherited and passed from generation to generation in the same families. Schools for scribes were held in temple courtyards. A scribe was exempt from the heavy manual labour to which most others in society were subject.
Kemp, Barry J. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Farmers in Ancient Egypt

Farmers lived in houses made of mud bricks. Men and boys worked in the fields irrigating crops with a shaduf, which brought water from a river into a canal. The women baked breads, brewed beer, spun thread and weaved it into various items. During the flood months of June to September, the farmers were often called for service to the government. Working for the government was known as corvee duty. Wealthier farmers and those holding official posts could buy their way out of the service. Those who didn’t served the duty working on large projects such as a temple or a pyramid.
Kemp, Barry J. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Slaves in Ancient Egypt

  Slaves were most commonly prisoners of war. Although the pyramids are often depicted as being built by slaves, there are little historical evidences of this. It was not until the Middle Kingdom that large groups of slaves were present in Egypt. During the Old Kingdom, when the pyramids were built, there is no evidence that Egypt maintained a large population of slaves. Slaves did not hold the same status in Ancient Egypt as slaves did during the time of the European expansion. For example, slaves could own land, marry freeborn people, and even employ servants. Slavery in Egypt did not mean total ownership.
Harris, Nathaniel. The History of Ancient Egypt. London England: Chancellor, 2000. Print.